Friday, December 27, 2013

Netflix (NFLX) - UPDATE: The Giant Killer is a Giant, But the Option Market is Still Asleep. What Happens When it Wakes Up?


This is a quick update to the article published on 12-21-213:
Netflix (NFLX) - The Giant Killer is a Giant, But the Option Market is Still Asleep. What Happens When it Wakes Up?

I have actually included the entire post below, with one update, which is today's (12-27-2013) intraday Symbol Summary:

Provided by Livevol


The premise of the first post was simply that the implied volatility for NFLX felt pretty low reflecting, potentially, not enough risk in the share price in the near-term.  Today we already see that the price is $6.28 lower and the volatility is 3.26 vol points or ~10% higher.

------------------

From 12-21-2013


NFLX closed Friday trading at $375.67, down 0.3% with IV30™ down small... again. The Symbol Summary is included below.


Provided by Livevol

Netflix, Inc. is an Internet television network with more than 33 million members in over 40 countries. In the United States, the Company’s subscribers can receive standard definition digital versatile disc (DVDs), and their high definition successor, Blu-ray discs (collectively DVD), delivered quickly to their homes.

I have written extensively on NFLX -- it really is one of my favorite subjects and favorite companies (that doesn't mean I have a position).  This option market has continued to show incredibly low risk n the stock and we have yet again hit another multi-year low in the implied.

Before I get started on the "today," let's look at the prior posts with some snippets.   You can read any post by simply clicking on the title:

11-26-2013: Netflix (NFLX) - This Newly Minted Giant Has a Big Secret; But It's in the Option Market...

11-26-2013

Provided by Livevol


10-15-2013: Netflix (NFLX) - How a New Industry Giant Shows 'Cheap' (?) Volatility into Earnings; Did You Know This?

9-18-2013: Netflix (NFLX) - The New Giant -- Stock Near All-time High but Volatility Collapses to Multi-year Low

9-10-2013: Netflix (NFLX) - Is this the Most Powerful Firm in Entertainment? Some Things I Bet You Didn't Know... But Want to.

4-25-2013: Netflix (NFLX) - Vol Nears Multi-Year Lows as Stock Explodes; Hollywood Take Note -- Another Shot Across Major Distributor’s Bows

This is a volatility note.  The first time I note low volatility in NFLX it was trading $216 at 46% vol. Today it is $375 at 33.76% vol. Here is a quick review from the most recent posts, which is relevant to this note which surrounds substantially depressed volatility in the option market.

---
So why is this happening to NFLX? Well, a lot of reasons, but one of the biggest is pretty simple:

NFLX now decides which TV shows are hits. Yeah, that's right. For example, the AMC original show Breaking Bad, the highest rated TV show ever by meta critics, was at a point after season 4 where its record viewership for any one episode was ~1.5 million people. That's actually very low.

An agreement was struck to put all of the "Breaking Bad" old seasons on NFLX for free (everything is free on NFLX with the monthly subscription). The first episode of season 5 aired to 3 million viewers (so a 100% increase). Then, the first episode of season 5 part II aired to 6 million viewers (NB: My numbers may be off wrt which season the bump(s) happened, do some fact checking before quoting me). OK, OK, is this really b/c of NFLX? Well, here's a direct quote from the show's creator, Vince Gilligan:

---
"I am grateful as hell for binge-watching. I am grateful that AMC and Sony took a gamble on us in the first place to put us on the air. But I'm just as grateful for an entirely different company that I have no stake in whatsoever: Netflix. I don't think you'd be sitting here interviewing me if it weren't for Netflix. In its third season, Breaking Bad got this amazing nitrous-oxide boost of energy and general public awareness because of Netflix."
---

Why does this matter? How about this... Instead of NFLX paying for content, the content providers may pay NFLX to air their shows. That's incredible.

Add to the fact that NFLX now has critically acclaimed original content -- that's content available ONLY on NFLX ("House of Cards" and "Orange is the New Black" are two of them) and what we're slowly finding here is that NFLX may become the most powerful content distributor for TV (the profitable part of the entertainment business) on the planet.

Don't laugh or roll eyes, it's happening right now. FOX is tying the same game as AMC did with "Breaking Bad" with their sitcom "The New Girl." And you know what?... it's working again...

Now NFLX does have competitors, namely AMZN (I know they're not the first name to come up from entertainment industry folks, but the entertainment industry is wrong -- AMZN is the risk for NFLX). Another risk is the content creators using their own channels (no pun intended)... but that doesn't seem to work so far (and yeah I know what Hulu is and who created it).

Here's more news, from CNBC a day after I posted this article:
---
Groundbreaking news that Virgin Media is bringing Netflix directly to its set-top box in the U.K. in effect elevates Netflix to the status of a new cable network-a benefit for a cable company and beyond being an upstart threat to cable.


The stock's nearly 220 percent gains this year have been driven largely by the success of its original content deals, which have helped add new subscribers, giving Wall Street confidence that exclusive originals will continue to deliver.

(More from Julia Boorstin: Is Apple's iRadio a Pandora killer? )

Virgin's parent, Liberty Global (LBTYA), gained just under a percentage point on Tuesday's news.

Virgin Media's partnership with Netflix is the first time a cable operator is bringing the streaming service directly to the set-top box. Other cable operators-like Comcast (CMCSA)-allow users to access Netflix through Internet-connected set-top boxes-but this is the first time a cable channel has directly made a deal with Netflix to treat its content just like that provided by cable channels like HBO (owned by Time Warner (TWX)) and Showtime (owned by CBS (CBS)). (Disclosure: Comcast is the owner of NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC and CNBC.com.)

Virgin will integrate Netflix with its television content so it's easy to seamlessly browse and search across both TV and streaming content.

Source: CNBC via Yahoo! Finance Why Netflix is at a new all-time high, written by Julia Boorstin.
---

On 10-15-2013 I noted that the volatility into earnings for NFLX was quite low.  The stock did in fact go from ~$355 to~$322 in a single day (while in that same day hitting $389, then dropping $65 intra-day). 



So the stock is up huge,the importance of this firm in the industry is up huger and the valuation proves it.  We're talking about a $21 billion firm now.

But here's the the thing, and there's no way around it.  The higher NFLX stock goes and the more power it has in the industry, the greater the potential fall.  I am a huge fan of NFLX and their management team's ability to resurrect a firm that many thought was dead to an incredibly powerful "new" firm. But, at these valuations, there is risk.  Also, there is substantial risk of higher valuations.

While $22 billion is a big firm, why can't NFLX be worth $100 billion?  So, I say, there is risk to both sides in this stock, yet the option market tells me I am wrong... and here's why...

Today (12-21-2013)

The two-year Charts Tab is included below.  The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20™ - blue vs HV180™ - pink).

Provided by Livevol

On the stock side we can see the remarkable run up from ~$55 to now $375, and all of this after the went from $10 to $300 and then back to $50.  As I have said several times, the management team at NFLX absolutely shocked the world twice.  First to become a giant, then to recover from the ashes to become an even bigger giant.

But the option market continues to tell a story that does not seem to be true.  And here it is... Let's turn to the two-year IV30™ chart below, in isolation.

Provided by Livevol

What we see how NFLX implied volatility continues to drop to new multi-year lows.  I have drawn that yellow horizontal line back two-years to illustrate the level of the current implied.  I wrote last time, there were two few mitigating factors:

1. The market wants to go up right now, it just does... So volatility (VIX) is low.
2. We're heading into Thanksgiving; a sleepy time not just for our grumbling tummies but also for the market at large.

But #2 isn't relevant anymore. The IV30™ is now based on Jan expiry.  And, yes, a part of Jan expiry covers Christmas / Hilidays, etc, but Jan expiry is Jan 18th.  That ain't the Holiday season anymore.

Last time I also wrote: "[H]ere's the fact that takes that mitigating factor stuff and throws it out the window.  Jan' 14 volatility is almost equally as depressed.  Yeah... it's true..."

Yeah, now we're in Jan expiry, and the vol is even lower.  I don't know if NFLX is going higher or lower, or if the market is going higher or lower, but this does not feel like a time when NFLX the company in and of itself is facing the lowest risk it has in the last several years.

Finally, let's turn to the Options Tab, for completeness.

Provided by Livevol

We can see Jan'14 volatility is priced to 32.75% (the last post in November it was priced at 36.49%). We can see that Feb vol is considerably higher and that's due to earnings coming out at the end of Jan (but after Jan expiry).

Let's take one last look at volatility in a slightly different way -- this time, the skew.


Provided by Livevol

Check out how differently Jan skew is shaped from from Feb skew.  Feb shows a much flatter shape, reflecting closer to an equal likelihood of an up move or a down move.  Watch that Jan/Feb skew difference.  The Feb calls are substantially more expensive (in terms of volatility).  If you believe Jan is truly a quiet period for NFLX (I mean a really quiet period), a calendar spread would off set a Feb call purchase but in the oddest way -- selling multi-year low vol to purchase elevated vol.  Not exactly options 101 trading, but hey, this is NFLX, we are way passed options 101 trading.

Please note, this is in no way advice or a recommendation. I'm pointing out facts. NO TRADES.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaims any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

12-26-2013: End of Day - Implied Volatility, Option Volume and Open Interest Movers


Names to watch in tomorrow's action...

Unusual Volatility Moves

Provided by OptionsXpress

Unusual Option Volume

Provided by OptionsXpress

Unusual Open Interest (OI) Increases

Provided by OptionsXpress

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaim any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.

Google (GOOG) - Volatility Dipping; Has the Option Market Fallen into a Mistaken Malaise?


GOOG is trading $1,117.65 up 0.5% with IV30™ up 3.9%. The Symbol Summary is included below.

Provided by Livevol

Google Inc. (Google) is a global technology company. The Company’s business is primarily focused around key areas, such as search, advertising, operating systems and platforms, enterprise and hardware products.

This is a stock and volatility note.  I see some pretty low volatility in GOOG right now.  This is nowhere near the obvious mis-pricing we saw in TWTR two weeks ago, but it's worth a look.

To read the TWTR post, you click on the title, below:
Twitter (TWTR) - UPDATE: How the Option Market Totally Blew It, And We Knew it Two-Weeks Ago.

Let's start with the GOOG Charts Tab (two-years), below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20™ - blue vs HV180™ - pink).

Provided by Livevol

On the stock side we can see the incredible rise of what is now a gigantic firm and possibly the front runner for the first first firm to ever reach $1 trillion in market cap (but don't fall asleep on AAPL). In the last two-years GOOG has added ~$200 billion in market cap value.  I'm actually laughing as I write that it's such a big number... Very well done management.

Check out the gap on the last earnings release (the blue "E" icons represent earnings dates). GOOG popped from $888.79 to $ 1,011.41 or ~14% in one day. So what?... Well, there's a volatility story building here.

Let's turn to the two-year IV30™ chart in isolation, below.

Provided by Livevol

The rises and falls into and out of earnings (the blue "E" icons) are normal, but I find a little abnormal is the current level of the implied.  Right now GOOG's IV30™ sits in the 14th percentile on an annual basis.  Hmmm...

Now that red curve will rise into earnings which are due out in mid January, and if it follows the general pattern of the last two years, that peak will be lower than the prior peak.  But, last time that was incorrect -- which is to say, the option market mis-priced the risk in the shares and the stock gapped more than $120 in a day.

This follows a similar pattern I have been seeing in the option market overall, which is a general malaise in pricing risk. I recently posted an article entitled:
Just the Facts Ma'am: Is the United States in a Bubble? Does the United States Look Identical to Japan Right Now?

Whether or not the US is in a bubble, there is a question.. that is, there is a two-sided argument. If that's the case, then a behemoth cap that has seen a rise in market cap over two-years that in and of itself would make it a top ten company by size in the US, should probably not be seeing volatility levels in the 14th percentile.

Finally, the Options Tab is included below.

Provided by Livevol

Across the top we can see that Jan vol is priced to 16.69% and Feb vol is priced to 21.78%.  That vol difference is likely due to earnings, so potentially look for GOOG earnings to come out after Jan 18th (or so the option market seems to be pricing).

Watch GOOG.  Watch the market. Watch the volatility.  I don't think now is the time for malaise.  But I have been wrong before... many times...


This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaims any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.

Twitter (TWTR) - UPDATE: How the Option Market Totally Blew It, And We Knew it Two-Weeks Ago.


This is a quick update to the post I published on 12-24-2013.

TWTR is trading $73.78, up 5.5% with IV30™ exploding up 53.1%. The Symbol Summary is included below.


Provided by Livevol

The entire prior post is included below.  The point simply is: Twitter (TWTR) - How the Option Market Totally Blew It, And We Knew it Two-Weeks Ago. (click on the link to read the post).

What you'll read below is that on 12-10-2013 TWTR options were priced to 57.22% volatility. I wrote a quick note on it and simply said: Twitter (TWTR) - Does The Option Market Have This One Wrong?

This was one of the greatest mispricings of volatility by the option market on a multi-billion dollar company that I have seen in several years.  The 57.22% volatility now stands at 111.25% and the stock has moved ~30%.  

The Prior post(s) are included below.
 
-----------------------------

TWTR is trading $70.66, up 9.5% with IV30™ popping 17.0%. The Symbol Summary is included below.


Provided by Livevol

I last wrote about TWTR on 12-10-2013 (so, exactly two weeks ago).  That note had a very specific point which is evident in the title. The option market was completely wrong about this name.

I have included the post below -- you can read it by clicking on the title.
Twitter (TWTR) - Does The Option Market Have This One Wrong?

My basic premise was pretty simple, here is a snippet from that prior post as well as the Symbol Summary from that time (remember, this is from two weeks ago), note the level not just of the stock, but the volatility.

Provided by Livevol

------------------------
From 12-10-2013

TWTR's IV60™ and IV90™ are 60.53% and 62.06%.

The company has earnings due out likely in Jan (possibly Feb expiry).  One quick question, did you know these firms all have higher 60-day implied volatilities than TWTR (and this excludes bio-techs)?


Provided by Livevol

Just to be clear, TWTR has lower vol than YELP (huh?) and TWTR has 30% lower vol than GOGO.

Let's see where this stock ends up, and take a snapshot (below) of what the option market reflects.


Provided by Livevol

Look at those ATM straddles... We'll re-visit in a month or two but for now the Option Market reads that TWTR will be in [$47.20, $54.65] on Jan 18. That feels like a tight price range... no?
------------------------

Back to today: 12-24-2013

The Options Tab from today is included below.

Provided by Livevol

Bottom line, that [$47.20, $54.65] range has completely blown up with the stock now trading above $70.  Keep in mind, the argument presented two weeks ago was NOT that TWTR was going to go up, it was simply that the risk reflected by the option market was wrong.

That $7.40 straddle is now worth $18.00... and by the way, we're still in December.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaim any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Tesla (TSLA) - The Option Market: "This Isn't a Bubble, It's Equilibrium With Upside"


TSLA closed Tuesday trading at $151.41, up 5.5% with IV30™ down another 1.0%. The Symbol Summary is included below.


Provided by Livevol

Tesla Motors, Inc. (Tesla) designs, develops, manufactures and sells electric vehicles and advanced electric vehicle powertrain components.


I have written about TSLA extensively (compulsively?), and have included the articles, below.  You can click on a title to read the posts.

Before getting into the details I do make one quick note.  In the post on 11-18-2013 I wrote that the skew in TSLA still showed a likelihood of an upside move (parabolic skew -- details below in the article).  In the last month the stock went from $124.76 (see symbol summary below) to now $151.41 with volatility dropping.

The option market totally blew it with TWTR (you can read that post by clicking the title here: Twitter (TWTR) - How the Option Market Totally Blew It, And We Knew it Two-Weeks Ago. ), but it was spot on with TSLA.

Further, I do note that walking into a TSLA dealership and speaking with a salesman (they are shareholders) has been a perfect indicator of earnings well ahead of anything Wall St. has projected.

Read the post from 8-8-2013: Tesla (TSLA) - Now a $20B Firm Off of Earnings Blow Out; How Wall St. Absolutely Blew It; But I didn't... And I'm Just a Guy...) below for an actual real-time example.


11-18-2013: Tesla Motors (TSLA) - Stock Collapsing, Volatility Rising, but the Paradigm Has Not Shifted... Yet

Provided by Livevol

11-6-2013: Tesla (TSLA) - Earnings Happened; Stock Falls Hard... But Do You Know The Facts About this Company?

Provided by Livevol

8-8-2013: Tesla (TSLA) - Now a $20B Firm Off of Earnings Blow Out; How Wall St. Absolutely Blew It; But I didn't... And I'm Just a Guy...


5-9-2013: Tesla (TSLA) - Earnings Explosion Spectacle Hides Vol Shift -- This is a New Company -- A Paradigm Shift is Complete


5-15-2013: Tesla (TSLA) - May Skew Stays Parabolic; Vol Diff Opens... And Some Stuff You May Not Have Known...


5-29-2013: Tesla (TSLA) - This is a New Company; The Paradigm Shift Continues; Part 3 of 3.



------------
Time Machine: Back to 11-18-1013
What's the news today? Well, it's sort of a summary of what the issue has been since 9-30-2013:

---
Shares slumped Monday and showed little sign of stemming the downside momentum that has picked up steam over the past six weeks.From car fires to a sour outlook to valuation concerns, the stock has lost more than 35% of its value since hitting a record high of $194.50 on Sept. 30.

Last week at the DealBook conference, CEO Elon Musk tried to give assurances that there was no reason to recall the Model S despite three car fires that have prompted questions about the car’s safety.

Source: The Wall St. Journal via Yahoo! Finance; Tesla Troubles Mount: Shares Tumble to Four-Month Low, written by Steven Russolillo.
---

There you have it. I wrote earlier this month:

---
Time Machine: Back to 11-6-1013
TSLA shares are down b/c while the demand for their product is high, they can't keep up with production.

That's it... They didn't hit some weird rumor numbers that were floating around the internet, but that's just... well, rumors and speculation. Now the stock did benefit from those rumors (maybe), and thus the stock drop could make sense. But let's not lose sight of the bigger picture:

This is a firm with demand outpacing production for a $70,000 - $100,000 per unit product.
---

But I'm off that story and on to a volatility story. Let's look at the two year IV30™ chart in isolation, below.

Provided by Livevol

Note that during this stock drop the implied volatility has actually been falling. 

Here's the thing though, there is something in the skew that changed a while ago and has NOT changed recently in TSLA and this is quite interesting.

First, let's turn to the Skew Tab for TSLA in August of this year (2013).

Provided by Livevol

Note the skew shape across the front three months; it's "normal"  The Out-of-the-money (OTM) puts are priced to higher volatility than the at-the-money (ATM) option and the OTM calls.  To read more about skew, what is and why it exists you can click the title below:

Understanding Option Skew -- What it is and Why it Exists.

While TSLA had normal skew back then (with the stock price at $135), the skew shape shifted dramatically as the long interest grew.  Let's turn to the Skew Tab as 11-18-2013, below.

Provided by Livevol

Now we can see a parabolic skew shape, which means that the option market reflects equally elevated risk to the upside and the downside.  So, while the stock has been collapsing, the option market still reads "upside has potential."  Watch this skew shape, if it turns back to the "old shape" (which is really a normal shape), then that would mean the option market no longer reflects that upside potential and that would in fact be a paradigm shift (again) for TSLA.
----------------------

Back to real-time
12-25-2013


The Charts Tab (two-years) is below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20™ - blue vs HV180™ - pink).

Provided by Livevol

We can see how the stock his risen rather abruptly from that dip off of highs.  But, there's information in the volatility as well.


Let's turn to the IV30™ chart in isolation, below.

Provided by Livevol

This is pretty awesome -- we can see that both as the stock has been rising recently, and even as the stock was dropping prior (see the blue "E' icon that represents an earnings date), the volatility has been dipping.  The option market reads that TSLA is falling quite comfortably into this valuation.  Note that, as we see with other stocks quite the opposite (like TWTR).

And what what about that skew?... Check out the Skew Tab below.

Provided by Livevol

Hey, there it is again... A parabolic skew that reflects both upside and downside risk for the Jan'14 options (it shows a similar shape for Feb'14).

So what?  The option market does not read that TSLA is a bubble, it reads that it is actually quite stable and that there is still "abnormal" skew reflecting two-sided risk.

Finally, the Options Tab is included below.

Provided by Livevol

Across the top we can see the monthly vols.  Note how depressed Jan'14 is.  That elevation to Feb'14 reflects an earnings release.  The implied should breach 60% and may rise above 80% as earnings get closer.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaim any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Twitter (TWTR) - How the Option Market Totally Blew It, And We Knew it Two-Weeks Ago.


TWTR is trading $70.66, up 9.5% with IV30™ popping 17.0%. The Symbol Summary is included below.


Provided by Livevol

I last wrote about TWTR on 12-10-2013 (so, exactly two weeks ago).  That note had a very specific point which is evident in the title. The option market was completely wrong about this name.

I have included the post below -- you can read it by clicking on the title.
Twitter (TWTR) - Does The Option Market Have This One Wrong?

My basic premise was pretty simple, here is a snippet from that prior post as well as the Symbol Summary from that time (remember, this is from two weeks ago), note the level not just of the stock, but the volatility.

Provided by Livevol

------------------------
From 12-10-2013

TWTR's IV60™ and IV90™ are 60.53% and 62.06%.

The company has earnings due out likely in Jan (possibly Feb expiry).  One quick question, did you know these firms all have higher 60-day implied volatilities than TWTR (and this excludes bio-techs)?


Provided by Livevol

Just to be clear, TWTR has lower vol than YELP (huh?) and TWTR has 30% lower vol than GOGO.

Let's see where this stock ends up, and take a snapshot (below) of what the option market reflects.


Provided by Livevol

Look at those ATM straddles... We'll re-visit in a month or two but for now the Option Market reads that TWTR will be in [$45.10, $59.90] on Jan 18. That feels like a tight price range... no?
------------------------

Back to today: 12-24-2013

The Options Tab from today is included below.

Provided by Livevol

Bottom line, that [$45.10, $59.90] range has completely blown up with the stock now trading above $70. Keep in mind, the argument presented two weeks ago was NOT that TWTR was going to go up, it was simply that the risk reflected bu the option market was wrong.

That $7.40 straddle is now worth $18.00... and by the way, we're still in December.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaim any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.

Monday, December 23, 2013

Transocean (RIG) - Stock and Volatility Implode, But Order Flow Bets Huge to Upside in Short-term


RIG is trading $47.31 up 0.7% with IV30™ up small. The Symbol Summary is included below.


Provided by Livevol

Transocean Ltd. (Transocean) is an international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The Company operates in two segments: contract drilling services and drilling management services.

This is a stock, volatility and order flow note -- all three of which are noteworthy phenomena.

Let's start with the Charts Tab (two-years) is below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20™ - blue vs HV180™ - pink).

Provided by Livevol

On the stock side we can see the price has gone from $39.14 to now $47.31 over two-years, or about a 20% appreciation.  But oh my how the chart has had its bumps.  I have highlighted the five large stock moves up over the last two-years, each of which was followed by a large stock move down.

Looking to the most recent move (the far right of the chart), we can see RIG went from $44.38 on 10-9-2013 to $55.37 on 11-11-2013 or a 25% pop in less than a month.  The stock now however is trading at $47.31, so almost all of that gain has been lost, again in about a month.

So, we see crazy stock moves, but the implied volatility would tell you a totally different story. Let's turn to the IV30™ chart in isolation, below.

Provided by Livevol

What we see here is rather than a steady state of risk reflected by the option market (or even increasing risk), a declining risk.  In fact, a hugely declining risk where the IV30™ has dipped from ~50% to now below 23%.  Huh?...

There's more to the volatility story, but this part makes sense. The Skew Tab snap (below) illustrates the vols by strike by month.

Provided by Livevol

We can see that RIG sewis parabolic, that is, it reflects both upside and downside risk equally.  This skew shape makes sense given the stock's movement over the last two-years, but is certainly not "normal" skew.

To read more about skew, what is and why it exists you can click the title below:
Understanding Option Skew -- What it is and Why it Exists.

Finally, the Options Tab is included below.

Provided by Livevol

Here's where the order flow part if the note comes in.  Check out the open interest (OI) in the Jan 52.5 calls.  It stands at 36,211.  As far as I can tell, that's larger than any strike and any option (call or put) in the entire option chain.  And ore interesting... those calls look like long interest.  This could very well be a bet that RIG follows its same pattern after a drop, which is a rather significant pop in the relatively short-term.  We'll see...

This is a great one to watch...

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaims any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Just the Facts Ma'am: Is the United States in a Bubble? Does the United States Look Identical to Japan Right Now?


Publish Date:  12-22-2013

The question of where the market will go "next year" is always a question... and it has various answers. This year in particular, though, there are concerns surrounding a stock bubble, and given the 2002 and 2008 bubble pops, that's scary.

Introduction
I will discuss and demonstrate:

1. A widely focused on metric to measure the bubble theory.

2. Show how similarly GNP and GDP track.

3. Give 20 and 10 year historical data on this metric and demonstrate that those two periods look quite different using data from the Board of the Federal Reserve and the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.

4. Illustrate that the S&P 500 had it's best year in 16 years in 2013.

5. Show you that Japan and the United States look nearly identical right now.

6. The stock market (S&P 500) has been up 25% or more 10 times since 1970 (excluding 2013).  In eight out of those ten years the market showed a positive return the year after.

A Step Back: What Does the S&P 500 Return Look Like This Year

Below I have included an ordered scatter plot of the annual returns of the S&P 500 since 1980.

Updated January 2014

Metric
This is note focuses on the notion of a bubble, with arguments for and against, but drilling down on one metric in particular: Total Market Cap / GDP (or GNP)

Why This Metric?
Basically, because Warren  Buffet says so.

Here is a snippet from The Motley Fool:

---
11-21-2013
In two separate interviews in 1999 and 2001 Buffett explained to Fortune magazine's Carol Loomis that determining whether the market is expensive or cheap doesn't have to be complicated. The metric Buffett uses is:


The market value of all publicly traded securities as a percentage of the country's business -- that is, as a percentage of GNP. The ratio has certain limitations in telling you what you need to know. Still, it is probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment.

Basically, Buffett divides the total market capitalization of the U.S. stock market by gross national product, or GNP -- not to be confused with gross domestic product, or GDP.

So how do you tell if the stock market is expensive? Buffett went on to explain: "If the percentage relationship falls to the 70% or 80% area, buying stocks is likely to work very well for you. If the ratio approaches 200% -- as it did in 1999 and a part of 2000 -- you are playing with fire."

Source: Warren Buffett's Favorite Market Indicator Shows the Stock Market Is Overvalued, written by Dan Dzombak.
---


Does This Metric Work?
Eh, kind of... From that same article comes this image (below) comparing the S&P 500 performance to Market Cap / GNP since 1995:


Provided by TheMotleyFool

I see them acting as coincidental indicators -- neither predicts the other, rather they move together. Obviously the S&P 500 is at an all-time high. The Market Cap / GNP is nearing highs reached in the last bubble (2007).  But I'll present data that shows something a bit different...

Why People Look at GDP
While Buffet  makes a point to specify GNP rather than GDP, a quick chart shows the two really don't differ that much.  I have included a chart from gurufocus with a time series of GDP and GNP, below.


Source: gurufocus.com

So GDP trails GNP a bit as of right now.

Answering the Question
OK, here we go.

Data again provided by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis for the last 20 years (the top is interpolated monthly, the bottom is quarterly).

Market Cap / GDP



Note that the median is 0.65 and the current level is 1.22.  But this chart all of a sudden looks very different when we squeeze it to ten years rather than twenty.  Checkout the same chart over 10-years, below.


Now we see where the fear is setting in (ignore 2002 and this is unchartered territory).  The first scatter chart way at the top of this post shows us that the S&P 500 so far has had its third largest gain in the last 34 years and this most recent chart illustrates that the Market Cap/ GDP measure is at its 10-year high.  Uh oh...

Mitigating Data
There is mitigating data, believe or not... It somehow gets left out of this argument often times.  This is a ratio, and if the denominator gets bigger (GDP), that ratio gets smaller.

Is there any reason to believe that GDP will grow faster than expected?  How about this article released today (Sunday 12-22-2013):

---
IMF Will Raise Forecast for U.S. Economy

WASHINGTON--The International Monetary Fund is raising its forecast for U.S. economic growth after Congress struck a budget deal and the Federal Reserve said it would begin to pull back on its signature bond-buying program, the fund's top official said Sunday.

"We see a lot more certainty for 2014," IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "So all of that gives us a much stronger outlook for 2014, which brings us to raising our forecast."

Ms. Lagarde did not immediately offer a new number in saying the IMF would raise its forecast. In October it said U.S. gross domestic product, the broadest measure of economic output, is expected to expand 2.5% in 2014.

U.S. GDP grew at its fastest pace in two years during the third quarter, increasing a revised 4.1%, and the unemployment rate has dropped to 7%, according to recent government reports.

Source: The Wall St. Journal written by Jeffrey Sparshott IMF Will Raise Forecast for U.S. Economy
---

Well now...

Even further, we know that US unemployment is not at the long-term goal for the FED (it's 7.0% right now and the goal is 5.5% (I think)).  So, that means there's room for expansion, as the IMF writes.  Hypothetically stock prices could rise, but that ratio of Market Cap / GDP could drop.

Want more mitigating factors?  
How about this incredible tidbit:

The stock market has been up 25% or more 10 times since 1970 (including 2013).
In order from best to worst the years were:
1995, 1975, 1997,  2013, 1989, 1998, 2003, 1985, 1991, 1980, 2009

The return of the S&P 500 the year after those huge gains was positive eight out of ten years (we don't know abut 2014 yet) (1981 and 1990 were negative years).

I have included S&P 500 returns from 1970 onward -- the 25%+ years are highlighted in green.


Source: Wikipedia

There does not seem to be any great force majeure for the market going down. Now, that doesn't mean it won't go down, but the rising tide of GDP (per the IMF) and the low cost of employment for firms with so many qualified applicants per job opening is at least some mitigating data that indicates, bubble or not, this market is not an obvious short.

Final Words
For those of you that follow me, you know that I have had my eye on Japan for a while.  That market is exploding.

Here's why I watch Japan so closely:

Check out this chart from the BUSINESS INSIDER:


What does it mean?... Playing loose and fast, it basically reads that The US and Japan are nearly identical in their Market Cap / GDP deviation from the the 10-year average. And what do you know... there's that number again... 10-years...

If you feel that Japan is a bubble, did you now the US looks just like Japan for this metric?

I didn't. But I do now.


Please note, this is in no way advice or a recommendation. I'm pointing out facts. NO TRADES.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.






Legal Stuff:
Options involve risk. Prior to buying or selling an option, an investor must receive a copy of Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options. Investors need a broker to trade options, and must meet suitability requirements.

The information contained on this site is provided for general informational purposes, as a convenience to the readers. The materials are not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from a qualified person, firm or corporation. Consult the appropriate professional advisor for more complete and current information. I am not engaged in rendering any legal or professional services by placing these general informational materials on this website.

I specifically disclaims any liability, whether based in contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise, for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in any way connected with access to or use of the site, even if I have been advised of the possibility of such damages, including liability in connection with mistakes or omissions in, or delays in transmission of, information to or from the user, interruptions in telecommunications connections to the site or viruses.

I make no representations or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained on this website. Any links provided to other server sites are offered as a matter of convenience and in no way are meant to imply that I endorse, sponsor, promote or am affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, or endorse any information contained on those sites, unless expressly stated.